Rights of workers to disconnect globally
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55516/ijlso.v3i1.127Keywords:
law, principle, program, professions.Abstract
The rights and principles for the digital decade, published by the EU Commission, Parliament and Council (European Declaration, 2023) are part of the statement that explicitly mentions the right to disconnection in its section on fair and just working conditions, where it is mentioned that the EU pledged to "ensure that everyone will be able to disconnect and benefit from guarantees of work-life balance in a digital environment".
However, in my opinion, it is a little too much to include this legislative power in the universal rule of law, because the rule of law is the highest general rule that summarizes social practice and guarantees the balance between the observance of rights and the fulfillment of rights. of duties. or if they are professions that require self-discipline, such as a investigating magistrate and a judicial police officer, they must complete an on-site investigation as quickly as possible, or a transparent agent to ensure that they are out. business hours.
References
Abbott, F. M., “The WTO Medicines Decision: World PharmaceuticalTrade and the Protection of Public Health”, (AJIL) 2/2005, p. 317;
Anagnostou, D., Mungiu-Pippidi A., “Domestic Implementation of Human Rights Judgments in Europe: Legal Infrastructure and Govern-ment Effectiveness Matter” EJIL 25/2014, 205;
Aust, A., “Kadi: Ignoring International Legal Obligations”, InternationalOrganizations Law Review 6/2009;
Smith, M. (2019). Staring into the abyss: A crisis of the rule of law in the EU. European Law Journal, 25(6), 561-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12345;
De Witte B (2018) International law introduction. In: Schütze R (ed) Globalisation and governance. International problems, European solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 227–242;
Duez D (2011) La démocratie participative européenne. Du citoyen à la société civile organisée. In: Chenevière C, Duchenne G (eds) Les modes d’expression de la citoyenneté européenne. Presses universitaires de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, p 90;
Kochenov D (2016) The acquis and its principles. The enforcement of the ‘Law’ versus the enforcement of ‘Values’ in the EU. In: Jakab A, Kochenov D (eds) The enforcement of EU law and values. Ensuring member states’ compliance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 11;
Le Galès P (2014) Gouvernance. In: Boussaguet L, Jacquot S, Ravinet P (eds) Dictionnaire des politiques publiques. Presses de Sciences Po, Paris, p 303;
Bertrand C (2013) La démocratie participative dans le système institutionnel de l’Union européenne, Siècles [en ligne], vol 37, p 6. https://journals.openedition.org/siecles/1246;
Plottka J, Müller M (2020) After a decade of EU pragmatism, it is time to talk about democracy again. EURACTIV Media network, Institut für Europäische Politik 8 December 2020 https://www.euractiv.com/section/future-eu/opinion/after-a-decade-of-eu-pragmatism-it-is-time-to-talk-about-democracy-again/
Von Ondarza N, Ålander M (2021) The conference on the future of Europe. Obstacles and opportunities to a European reform initiative that goes beyond crisis management. SWP Comment 2021/C 19, 17 March 2021, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs. https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/the-conference-on-the-future-of-europe
Schutser J (2020) Report on economic policies of the euro area 2020, 2020/2078(INI), point K available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0193_EN.html
Kaiser, Lena: A New Chapter in the European Rule of Law Saga?: On the European Commission's attempt to mobilise Art. 2 TEU as a stand-alone provision, VerfBlog, 2023/3/04, https://verfassungsblog.de/a-new-chapter-in-the-european-rule-of-law-saga/ , DOI: 10.17176/20230304-185110-0.
Pech/Kochenov, Respect for Rule of Law in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice: A Casebook Overview of Key Judgments since the Portuguese Judges Case, 2021, p. 146;
Giegerich, Die Unabhängigkeit der Gerichte als Strukturvorgabe der Unionsverfassung und ihr effektiver Schutz vor autoritären Versuchungen in den Mitgliedstaaten, in: ZEuS 22 (2019) p. 61 (95);
Ione Stuessy Wright; Lisa M. Nekhom (December 1978). Historical dictionary of Argentina. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-1144-7., p. 458-498;
Riofrío Martínez-Villalba, Juan Carlos (2016-04). „SCOPE AND LIMITS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY”. Revista chilena de derecho. 43 (1): p. 283–309. doi:10.4067/S0718-34372016000100012. ISSN 0718-3437. Accesat în 20.06.2023;
Jaworyska, K, (2022) „Dreptul la deconectare”, Studies on Labor Drept și Politică Socială, 29, nr 1 p. 51-55;
The Justice System Journal Vol. 33, No. 2, Rule of Law (2012), pp. 131-135 (5 pages) Published By: National Center for State Courts
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Legal and Social Order
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
