THE DECISION OF THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT (RCC) NO. 412 OF 24 SEPTEMBER 2025 – (IN)COMPATIBILITY WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF INDEPENDENCE OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES PROVIDED FOR BY EUROPEAN LEGISLATION

Autori

  • Ionela Alina Zorzoană Teaching Assistant, PhD National School of Political and Administrative Studies, Faculty of Public Administration

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55516/ijlso.v5i1.293

Cuvinte cheie:

regulatory, independence, political intervention, EU law, energy.

Rezumat

The study examines the considerations of Decision no. 412/2025 of the Constitutional Court, relating them to the requirements of institutional independence of regulatory authorities, enshrined in the norms and case law of the European Union. The originality of the study lies in its comparative perspective on the Court's reasoning and the Romanian state's obligations under EU law, particularly regarding the protection of the functional, organizational, and financial autonomy of these entities.

The analysis highlights the fact that the pronounced solution allows for excessive political interference in the organization and exercise of regulatory powers, which may affect their impartiality and neutrality. It will be emphasized that the lack of adequate guarantees of independence contravenes the standards set out in the sectoral directives and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, thereby creating grounds for possible non-conformity of domestic law.

The study draws attention to the risk of a conflict of norms, likely to lead to infringement procedures against Romania. The conclusion will support the need for a constitutional interpretation that integrates European standards, ensuring the effectiveness of the principle of autonomy of regulatory authorities and compliance with the commitments assumed by the Romanian state within the Union.

Referințe

Rizzuto, F. The Independence of National Regulatory Authorities: Is There Now an Autonomous EU Law Concept of Independence of General Application? (C-378/19 President of the Slovak Republic) CoRe; Berlin Vol. 5, Iss. 1, (2021): 64-75. DOI:10.21552/core/2021/1/12;

Szescilo, D., Challenging Administrative Sovereignty: Dimensions of Independence of National Regulatory Authorities Under the EU Law, EUROPEAN PUBLIC LAW 27(1), 2021, https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2021008

Sajo, A. Independent Regulatory Authorities as Constitutional Actors: A Comparative Perspective. Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eövös Nominatae - Sectio Iuridica. TOMUS XLVIII. 5-51, 2007;

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/creating-a-culture-of-independence_97892 64274198-en.html#:~:text=This%20report%20provides%20practical%20advic e%20on%20how,regulators%20and%20how%20to%20interact%20with%20them.

https://www.oecd.org/

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions "Fit for Target 55": meeting the EU's 2030 climate target, the path towards climate neutrality (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/RO/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0550).

Communication from the Commission — EU law: Better results through better application https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.C_.2017.018.01.0010.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AC%3A2017%3A018%3AFULL

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL First report on application and functioning of the Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive (EU) 2016/680 (‘LED’) (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52022DC0364).

OECD (2014), The Governance of Regulators, OECD Best Practice Principles for Regulatory Policy, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264209015-en.

OECD (2012), Recommendation of the Council on Regulatory Policy and Governance, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264209022-en.

https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/creating-a-culture-of-independence_978 9264274198-en.html.

DEX, https://dexonline.ro/

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) 19 October 2016 In Case C‑424/15, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court, Spain);

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) 6 March 2025 (*) In Case C‑48/23, REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the markkinaoikeus (Market Court, Finland), made by decision of 1 February 2023;

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ústavný súd Slovenskej republiky — Slovak Republic) — proceedings brought by Prezident Slovenskej republiky, Case C-378/19;

The Decision of he Romanian Constitutional Court (Rcc) No. 412 Of 24 September 2025.

Descărcări

Publicat

2025-12-20

Cum cităm

Zorzoană, I. A. (2025). THE DECISION OF THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT (RCC) NO. 412 OF 24 SEPTEMBER 2025 – (IN)COMPATIBILITY WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF INDEPENDENCE OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES PROVIDED FOR BY EUROPEAN LEGISLATION. International Journal of Legal and Social Order, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.55516/ijlso.v5i1.293

Număr

Secțiune

Section:Law